Sure, he hates Laurence Olivier's Hamlet but that's because he thinks its bad; he was still excited to see it. He says the nice thing about Phoebe is she can tell a good movie from a bad movie, implying there are good movies. He talks about people who laugh at the wrong parts (Brossard and Ackley), implying there are right parts. I hear you say "Caroline, these are such picky points. He probably still dislikes most movies, even if its not every single one". And I hear you. I still got the impression throughout the narrative that Holden seems exactly the kind of person inclined to like movies, because he's constantly casting himself in them.
Holden likes ideals---especially if they can remain unchanged---and images that represent those ideals. He starts fights he has no intention of winning so that he can be the guy getting beat up by a bully without hitting back. He values martyrdom (as we see from his admiration of James Castle), so he puts himself in that role even if that image gets ruined when we pan out and see Holden is the one that started the fight. He likes to paint himself, despite being a 17 year old, as a weathered and jaded old guy. He laughs and thanks them when bartenders ask how old he is, and he claims that he smokes far too much and is trying to cut back. When he's talking to Sally Hayes, the way he describes running away sounds less like a plausible reality, and more like he's got a movie script and is trying to cast Sally and himself in the lead roles. Also, the way he romanticizes people feels like a movie too. Its all expositional details, the kings in the back row, and never the broad strokes that most people would use to describe a friend to someone who doesn't know them.
The overall effect produced by these things is weird. On the one hand, Catcher in the Rye is a work of fiction, and thus I should not be surprised it contains the conventions of fiction (show, don't tell, etc). But on the other hand, it really does feel like it's Holden and not just Salinger who utilises these tropes and tools of works of fiction. Maybe Salinger is only trying to hint at Holden being a natural writer, but for me I kept being struck by the feeling that Holden (being so well versed in and inclined to use the conventions of storytelling) watches a lot more movies than he'd like to let on.
I agree that Holden likes the movies a lot more than he admits. We know that he goes to watch movies with his friends and with Phoebe and Allie. He also pretends that he is a character in a movie after his fight with Maurice. I think that even the way this book is written reflects the style of a movie. Each of the chapters is written as if it could be a scene in a movie. For a person who complains so much about movies, Holden talks a lot about them.
ReplyDeleteI agree that Holden does kind of live the life of a movie in how he presents himself. I think that a lot of his dislike for movies (if he really does hate movies) might be from his brother, D.B.
ReplyDeleteThis is weird. It seems like movies are one of the things that Holden hates on principle because they are popular and seem "phony", but doesn't actually dislike as much as he wants the reader to think
ReplyDeleteI think you're right--Holden actually does like the movies more than he says he does (and he especially likes going to them with Phoebe--his anecdote about how the two of them totally get into _The 39 Steps_ together is classic). But also in classic Caulfield style, and as with most critical things we might say about him, he's all to aware of the contradiction. He "hates" movies in part because he does like them, and they have very much infiltrated his consciousness (how many times do we see him pretend he's in a movie?), and he knows he's susceptible to their "phoniness"--they push his buttons. Is this dynamic familiar to you at all? "Hating" something because it *does* get to you, despite your "rational" mind saying you should hate it? Like, maybe if some insipid pop song gets into your head and you find yourself humming it, even though you know it's totally uncool and not at all the kind of reputable thing you *should* be humming . . .
ReplyDelete